π Property concerns goods, but persons and certain things remain outside its scope.
A person can own property, but cannot become its object.
β Must-know
Further detail
Imagine the bodyβs tangible elements beside the image, voice, and intimacy that can be detached only as information.
β Must-know
π The human body taken as a whole remains outside legal commerce, while personal goods are subject to highly restricted and regulated commerce.
π Under Article L. 1211-2 of the Code of Public Health, removing human bodily elements or collecting bodily products requires the donorβs prior consent, which may be revoked at any time.
Further detail
When the law provides that personal goods cannot be the subject of a patrimonial right, their commerce is permitted only without payment.
Under Article L. 1211-2 of the Code of Public Health, using bodily elements or products for a medical or scientific purpose other than the original one is possible unless the person was informed beforehand and objected.
Article L. 1211-2 of the Code of Public Health prohibits, after the personβs death, using germinal tissues or cells for a purpose other than the original removal.
The European Court of Human Rights refused to classify human embryos as goods in Parillo v. Italy, Grand Chamber, 27 August 2015, no. 46470/11. - CEDH, Parillo c/ Italie, 27 aoΓ»t 2015
The voice, image, and private life may nevertheless be the subject of genuine contracts for payment.
The whole body stays outside commerce; detached personal attributes enter it only under strict limits.
β Must-know
Further detail
π Article 714(2) of the Civil Code allows the law to regulate how common things are enjoyed in order to settle conflicts of interest and preserve their use for all.
A work entering the public domain is not public property: after 70 years from the authorβs death, heirs lose its economic rights of representation and reproduction but retain moral rights of disclosure, attribution, integrity, withdrawal, and repentance.
First names and most surnames are common things, but a surname that has gained notoriety may become a distinctive sign detached from its bearer.
π French words are common things, but they may be partially appropriated as trademarks under the law, subject to the principle of trademark specialty.
Utility without scarcity β no need for exclusive ownership.
β Must-know
π Common things have no owner, whereas public property belongs to the State, a local authority, or a public establishment.
π Under Article L. 2111-1 of the General Code on Public Property, public property includes property assigned to the direct use of the public or to a public service, provided that service property has indispensable arrangements for carrying out its tasks.
Further detail
π Under Articles L. 2122-1 to L. 2122-4 of the General Code on Public Property, occupying public property requires authorization, and its use cannot exceed the limits of the publicβs right of use.
π Occupation or use of public property is temporary, precarious, and revocable, and is generally subject to payment unless an exception applies.
β Must-know
Further detail
Garrett Hardin argued in βThe tragedy of commonsβ (1968) that an open-access pasture tends to deteriorate because each herder is encouraged to overexploit it without bearing the effort of protecting it. - Garett Hardin
Examples of commons include:
π Commons may involve shared exclusivity among several users or rights limited to certain uses of a thing, rather than unrestricted access for everyone.
Open access risks depletion; limited, concerned users can manage a resource collectively.
Common Things and Public Property
| Dimension | Common things | Public property |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | No owner | State, local authority, or public establishment |
| Use or assignment | Use common to all | Assigned to direct public use or a qualifying public service |
| Examples | Seawater mass and non-domain watercourses | Domain watercourses and waterways taken as a whole |
Take a 11-question practice quiz on Exclusions from Property, with every answer explained.
1. A buyer claims to own another individual as an object of property, while also owning that individualβs bicycle. Which assessment best reflects the boundary of property?
2. Which statement best describes the scope of property in relation to persons and things?
Memorize the key concepts of Exclusions from Property with 10 flashcards.
What does property concern, and what remains outside its scope?
Property concerns goods; persons and certain things remain outside its scope.
What capacity does legal personality confer?
The capacity to hold rights and be attributed obligations.
In property law, what role does a legal person occupy in the subject-object relationship?
The subject, not the object.
Upload your class notes and Revizly writes a study guide, a quiz and flashcards in about a minute.
Study guide maker