Equity and Trusts Practice Quiz (34 questions)

All questions and answers

1. Which distinction correctly compares Grey v IRC [1960] with Vandervell v IRC (No. 1) [1967]?

Grey involved a disclaimer, while Vandervell involved a transfer of an existing equitable interest
Grey concerned legal title, while Vandervell concerned a beneficiary’s direction to another person
Grey treated both directions as requiring writing under section 53(1)(c)
Grey involved a disposition requiring writing, while Vandervell involved a direction that extinguished the trust

Grey involved a disposition requiring writing, while Vandervell involved a direction that extinguished the trust

Explanation

In Grey, directing trustees to transfer the beneficial interest to another person was a disposition requiring writing. In Vandervell, directing the transfer of legal title extinguished the trust, so the section 53(1)(c) formalities did not apply.

2. What does an injunction do?

It awards damages for every breach of a contractual obligation
It sets aside a transaction and restores the parties to their earlier positions
It transfers legal title in trust property from a trustee to a beneficiary
It orders a person to do something or to stop doing something

It orders a person to do something or to stop doing something

Explanation

An injunction is an equitable remedy controlling conduct by requiring an act or restraining an act. Rescission, in contrast, sets aside a transaction and seeks to restore the parties to their pre-contract position.

3. What is a trustee’s central fiduciary obligation when administering trust property?

To act in the beneficiary’s best interests
To follow the beneficiary’s commercial preferences
To use the trust property for personal advantage
To transfer the property to any suitable claimant

To act in the beneficiary’s best interests

Explanation

The trustee holds legal title but must administer the trust according to the trust instrument and trust law for the beneficiary’s best interests. Personal use of trust property for the trustee’s own benefit would conflict with that fiduciary obligation.

4. What is the distinction between constitution and formalities in trust law?

Constitution concerns statutory compliance, while formalities concern completing the property transfer
Constitution concerns completing the trust-creating steps, while formalities concern statutory compliance
Constitution concerns proving intention, while formalities concern determining whether property exists
Constitution concerns identifying beneficiaries, while formalities concern selecting trustees

Constitution concerns completing the trust-creating steps, while formalities concern statutory compliance

Explanation

Constitution asks whether the necessary transfer or declaration has been completed, while formalities ask whether statutory requirements have been satisfied. The other distinctions assign unrelated trust requirements to these concepts.

5. What does unconscionability address in equity?

A transfer of property made without any form of consideration
Conduct or circumstances so unfair that taking a conditional benefit may be prevented
A mistake that automatically invalidates every commercial agreement
A dispute in which one party receives less money than expected

Conduct or circumstances so unfair that taking a conditional benefit may be prevented

Explanation

Unconscionability concerns unfair conduct or circumstances that may justify preventing a person from taking advantage of a benefit accepted subject to conditions or obligations. A disappointing financial outcome, without the relevant unfair circumstances, does not by itself establish unconscionability.

6. How must a testamentary trust be created to satisfy the applicable formalities?

By transferring the property to a trustee during the settlor’s lifetime
By a validly executed will under section 9 of the Wills Act 1837
By an oral declaration made during the settlor’s lifetime
By signed written evidence of the trust without executing a will

By a validly executed will under section 9 of the Wills Act 1837

Explanation

A testamentary trust takes effect through a validly executed will complying with section 9 of the Wills Act 1837. An oral or lifetime arrangement concerns an inter-vivos trust rather than a testamentary trust.

7. What sequence best describes the method for solving a trust problem question?

Classify the parties, identify the applicable remedy, apply formalities, then determine whether a proprietary interest exists
State the legal result, identify the parties, classify the transaction, then consider whether an interest moved
Identify the relevant case, state its facts, compare the transaction, then decide whether the parties acted fairly
Identify where the proprietary interest moves, classify the transaction, apply the law and exceptions, then conclude

Identify where the proprietary interest moves, classify the transaction, apply the law and exceptions, then conclude

Explanation

The method begins by identifying the movement of the proprietary interest, then classifies the transaction, applies the relevant law and any equitable exception, and reaches a conclusion. The legal result belongs in the conclusion, not in place of identifying the issue.

8. What is the orthodox equitable response to an imperfect transfer that has not validly created a gift?

Equity generally validates it once the donor has expressed a clear intention
Equity generally does not convert it into a declaration of trust
Equity generally transfers legal title directly to the intended recipient
Equity generally treats it as a resulting trust for the intended recipient

Equity generally does not convert it into a declaration of trust

Explanation

The orthodox rule is that equity will not perfect an imperfect gift by construing it as a declaration of trust. A clear intention or an incomplete transfer does not, by itself, allow equity to substitute a different method of creating the trust.

9. Which set contains the five principal categories used to analyse a trust problem?

Outright transfer, testamentary gift, constructive trust, equitable lien, and proprietary estoppel
Self-declaration, transfer of legal title, variation of trust, fiduciary breach, and tracing
Creation by contract, sale of land, assignment of debt, disclaimer of interest, and breach of trust
Self-declaration, outright transfer, transfer to trustees, disposition of an equitable interest, and imperfect transfer

Self-declaration, outright transfer, transfer to trustees, disposition of an equitable interest, and imperfect transfer

Explanation

The five principal categories are self-declaration, outright transfer, transfer to trustees, disposition of an existing equitable interest, and imperfect transfers. The other sets combine trust categories with remedies, doctrines, or transactions that do not form this analytical framework.

10. Why could the email in Hudson v Hathway [2022] satisfy the signature requirement for a disposition?

The application automatically displayed the sender’s identity
The email was sent from an account registered to the sender
The recipient understood the message as referring to the sender
The sender intentionally included their name to authenticate the communication

The sender intentionally included their name to authenticate the communication

Explanation

In Hudson v Hathway, the sender’s name functioned as a signature because it was intentionally included to authenticate the email. An automatically displayed account or application name may identify a sender without demonstrating deliberate authentication.

11. When does a beneficiary’s interest fail to bind a purchaser of the legal estate?

When a bona fide purchaser for value acquires it without notice of the beneficial interest
When a beneficiary disposes of the interest by gift with the trustee’s consent
When a volunteer receives the legal estate with full knowledge of the beneficial interest
When a trustee transfers the property to another trustee for continued management

When a bona fide purchaser for value acquires it without notice of the beneficial interest

Explanation

A bona fide purchaser for value of the legal estate who acquires it without notice of the beneficial interest is not bound by that interest. A purchaser with knowledge, or a trustee managing the trust property, falls into a different position.

12. Which arrangement contains the necessary subject matter for a trust?

Legal ownership of land held by trustees for identified beneficiaries
A personal promise to provide advice to a friend when requested
An informal request that someone maintain a family relationship
A moral expectation that one person will behave generously toward another

Legal ownership of land held by trustees for identified beneficiaries

Explanation

The subject matter of a trust must be property, such as legal ownership of land or invested funds. Personal promises, moral expectations, and social requests do not themselves provide trust property.

13. Which combination may support an unconscionability claim?

A written contract, a profitable transaction, and independent legal advice
A property transfer, a later disagreement, and an unexpected inheritance
An offer, a counteroffer, and a completed payment made voluntarily
An assurance, reliance on it, and detriment assessed in the circumstances

An assurance, reliance on it, and detriment assessed in the circumstances

Explanation

Unconscionability may arise from the combination of an assurance, reliance, and detriment, considered in the circumstances of the case. The existence of an ordinary transaction or later disagreement does not by itself supply that equitable combination.

14. Which set of requirements is necessary for an effective express trust?

A beneficiary’s consent, a court order, and registration of every trust asset
Intention, valid declaration, and proper constitution by self-declaration or effective transfer
A statutory instrument, a commercial purpose, and judicial approval
A written promise, consideration, and acceptance by the intended trustee

Intention, valid declaration, and proper constitution by self-declaration or effective transfer

Explanation

An express trust requires intention to create a trust, a valid declaration, and proper constitution through self-declaration or effective transfer of legal title. A declaration without constitution is ineffective because the trust property has not been properly vested.

15. Why did the circumstances in Thorner v Major [2009] make it unconscionable to deny Thorner’s expectation?

A written sale contract transferred the farm before the dispute arose
A statutory trust required the property to pass to Thorner automatically
Family reliance developed through repeated assurances over a long period
A commercial developer accepted a known risk after contract negotiations ended

Family reliance developed through repeated assurances over a long period

Explanation

In Thorner v Major, the family context, repeated assurances, and Thorner’s long-term reliance made it unconscionable to deny his expectation of inheriting the farm. The case did not turn on an experienced commercial party knowingly accepting contractual risk.

16. What formal requirement applies when a person disposes of an existing equitable interest?

The disposition must be in writing and signed by the disponer or an authorised agent
The disposition must be declared orally before the legal trustee
The disposition must be made through a validly executed will
The disposition must be completed by transferring legal title to a new trustee

The disposition must be in writing and signed by the disponer or an authorised agent

Explanation

Section 53(1)(c) requires a disposition of an existing equitable interest to be in writing and signed by the person disposing of it or an authorised agent. The rule concerns written evidence of the equitable disposition, not a will or a transfer of legal title.

17. What was the effect of the Judicature Acts 1873 and 1875 on the relationship between common law and equity?

They made the Lord Chancellor the final decision-maker in every civil dispute
They reorganised the courts so both principles could be administered within one court structure
They abolished equitable principles and required courts to apply common-law rules
They created separate courts so common law and equity could not influence each other

They reorganised the courts so both principles could be administered within one court structure

Explanation

The Judicature Acts reorganised the courts, allowing common-law and equitable principles to be administered within the same court structure. They did not abolish equity or preserve entirely separate court systems for the two bodies of principle.

18. What power does a trustee have under a discretionary trust?

The trustee holds the property for an adult beneficiary who may demand transfer at any time
The trustee returns the beneficial interest to the person who originally provided the property
The trustee must distribute equal shares to every person named in the trust
The trustee decides within the trust’s limits which identified beneficiaries receive property and when or how much

The trustee decides within the trust’s limits which identified beneficiaries receive property and when or how much

Explanation

A discretionary trust gives the trustee power, within defined limits, to select among identified beneficiaries and determine timing or amounts of distributions. Equal predetermined shares describe a fixed trust rather than a discretionary one.

19. Which remedy is most directly concerned with requiring a party to perform contractual obligations?

A trust, because it converts every contractual duty into a proprietary relationship
Specific performance, because it requires contractual duties to be carried out
An injunction, because it determines the parties’ beneficial interests in property
Rescission, because it cancels the transaction and restores the earlier position

Specific performance, because it requires contractual duties to be carried out

Explanation

Specific performance requires a party to carry out contractual obligations, whereas rescission sets the transaction aside and seeks restoration of the pre-contract position. An injunction may control conduct, but it is not the remedy defined by enforcing the contract’s performance.

20. Who creates a testamentary trust by making a will?

A testator or testatrix
A trustee acting under instructions
A beneficiary accepting property
A settlor transferring property during life

A testator or testatrix

Explanation

A person who creates a trust by will is called a testator or testatrix, and the resulting trust is testamentary. A settlor generally creates an inter vivos trust during life rather than one established by a will.

21. Why must a trust generally have a human beneficiary?

The beneficiary determines the trustee’s investment strategy
The beneficiary can enforce the obligation and has locus standi
The beneficiary automatically receives legal title to the property
The beneficiary converts every trust into a contractual arrangement

The beneficiary can enforce the obligation and has locus standi

Explanation

A human beneficiary is required because that person can enforce the trustee’s obligation and has locus standi. The trustee, rather than the beneficiary, holds legal title to the trust property.

22. Which statement correctly distinguishes formalities for trusts of personal property and land?

Land may generally be declared orally, while personal property requires signed written evidence
Both personal property and land generally require a validly executed will
Both personal property and land generally require a deed before a trust can arise
Personal property may generally be declared orally, while land requires signed written evidence

Personal property may generally be declared orally, while land requires signed written evidence

Explanation

An inter-vivos trust of personal property generally requires no formality, whereas a declaration of trust of land must comply with section 53(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925. The other choices reverse or replace these requirements with formalities that do not generally apply.

23. Which set correctly identifies the three pillars of modern equity?

Common-law precedent, criminal penalties, and jury verdicts
Contractual duties, statutory offences, and administrative rules
Equitable maxims, equitable remedies, and trusts
Legal ownership, judicial review, and parliamentary privilege

Equitable maxims, equitable remedies, and trusts

Explanation

Modern equity is commonly described through its three pillars: equitable maxims, equitable remedies, and trusts. The other combinations refer to broader legal concepts rather than the principal components of equity.

24. Which three methods were recognised in Milroy v Lord as possible ways to make an effective gift or trust?

A will, a resulting trust, or a constructive trust imposed by equity
An outright gift, a transfer to trustees, or a self-declaration of trust
A deed, a court order, or a transfer completed by an unauthorised agent
An oral promise, a future inheritance, or a transfer to beneficiaries

An outright gift, a transfer to trustees, or a self-declaration of trust

Explanation

Milroy v Lord identifies an outright transfer to the donee, a transfer to trustees, and a self-declaration of trust as the three possible methods. The other combinations include arrangements that do not constitute the recognised methods for effecting the intended gift or trust.

25. What is the consequence when a disposition of an existing equitable interest fails to comply with section 53(1)(c) of the Law of Property Act 1925?

The disposition is void and the equitable interest does not transfer
The disposition is voidable but effective until challenged by a beneficiary
The disposition is valid but the trustee may require later confirmation
The disposition transfers the interest while creating a personal remedy

The disposition is void and the equitable interest does not transfer

Explanation

Section 53(1)(c) formalities are required for a disposition of an existing equitable interest, so non-compliance makes the disposition void. A compliant disposition, by contrast, transfers the equitable interest rather than merely creating a personal remedy.

26. What determines the distribution of property in a fixed trust?

The trustee chooses beneficiaries and amounts whenever circumstances change
The court distributes the property according to later commercial needs
Each adult beneficiary calls for the legal estate at a chosen time
The settlor or testator determines who receives what

The settlor or testator determines who receives what

Explanation

In a fixed trust, the settlor or testator specifies both the recipients and their entitlements. The trustee therefore does not have the discretionary power to decide which beneficiaries receive property or how much they receive.

27. What is the main distinction between a statutory trust and an express trust?

A statutory trust is created by a beneficiary, whereas an express trust arises automatically from family relations
A statutory trust transfers equitable title to Parliament, whereas an express trust transfers legal title to the beneficiary
A statutory trust depends on judicial discretion, whereas an express trust arises from an accidental property transfer
A statutory trust is created by legislation, whereas an express trust is deliberately created by a settlor or testator

A statutory trust is created by legislation, whereas an express trust is deliberately created by a settlor or testator

Explanation

Statutory trusts arise because Parliament has created them through legislation, while express trusts result from the deliberate decision of a settlor or testator. Their difference concerns how the trust comes into existence, not which party receives title.

28. Why did the claim fail in Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008]?

Parliament had created a statutory trust governing the disputed property
The experienced property developer knew no binding contract existed and accepted the commercial risk
The trustee lacked a human beneficiary who could enforce the obligation
The claimant relied on family assurances concerning a long-anticipated inheritance

The experienced property developer knew no binding contract existed and accepted the commercial risk

Explanation

Cobbe’s claim failed because the experienced developer understood that no binding contract had been concluded and accepted the associated commercial risk. That informed commercial position contrasted with the family reliance that supported equitable intervention in Thorner.

29. Which description correctly distinguishes the trustee’s interest from the beneficiary’s interest in a trust?

The trustee has equitable title in personam, while the beneficiary has legal title in rem
The trustee has legal title in rem, while the beneficiary has equitable rights in personam
The trustee has a contractual claim, while the beneficiary has no enforceable right
The trustee and beneficiary hold identical legal and equitable titles

The trustee has legal title in rem, while the beneficiary has equitable rights in personam

Explanation

The trustee receives legal title, a proprietary right in rem attaching to the property, while the beneficiary receives equitable title, a personal right in personam operating through notice. Treating both parties as holding identical titles overlooks the central division of ownership in a trust.

30. A settlor wants to create a trust while retaining legal title to the property; which method achieves this?

The settlor records the arrangement in a will taking effect at death
The settlor transfers legal title to another person as trustee
The settlor declares that they hold the property on trust
The settlor gives the property outright to the intended beneficiary

The settlor declares that they hold the property on trust

Explanation

A settlor can constitute a trust by self-declaration, meaning the settlor continues to hold legal title but does so as trustee. Transferring the property to another trustee would move legal title away from the settlor.

31. What development occurred in the Court of Chancery by the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries?

It abandoned equitable principles in favor of settled common-law rules
It developed a distinct jurisdiction addressing strict common-law rights contrary to conscience
It became a criminal court applying penalties for breaches of the peace
It acquired authority to administer every dispute arising in the kingdom

It developed a distinct jurisdiction addressing strict common-law rights contrary to conscience

Explanation

By this period, the Court of Chancery had developed a separate jurisdiction for cases where strict common-law rights conflicted with conscience. This did not turn it into a general criminal court or give it unlimited authority over all disputes.

32. Why did petitions against the rigidity of common-law remedies come to be referred to the Lord Chancellor during the Middle Ages?

The Chancellor could intervene when strict legal rights conflicted with conscience
The Chancellor could replace every common-law rule with a discretionary remedy
The Chancellor could impose criminal penalties for unfair legal outcomes
The Chancellor could transfer property disputes directly to Parliament

The Chancellor could intervene when strict legal rights conflicted with conscience

Explanation

The Lord Chancellor, traditionally called the Keeper of the King’s conscience, addressed cases in which settled common-law rules produced outcomes contrary to conscience. Common-law courts continued to apply established rules rather than giving the Chancellor general power to replace them.

33. When may equity treat a transfer as complete under Re Rose [1952]?

When a court considers the intended gift desirable despite substantial steps remaining
When the donor has expressed an intention but has not begun the required transfer process
When the donor has done everything within their power and only a third party’s act remains
When the recipient has obtained possession even though the donor retained control

When the donor has done everything within their power and only a third party’s act remains

Explanation

Re Rose allows equity to treat the transfer as complete where the donor has done everything within their power and a third party must finish the legal process. It does not apply where the donor still has required steps to perform, which reflects the orthodox concern in Milroy v Lord.

34. Which statement best defines a trust?

It is a personal promise requiring one party to assist another person
It is a relationship in which trustees hold property for beneficiaries
It is a contract in which beneficiaries manage property for the trustees
It is a court order transferring legal ownership to a successful claimant

It is a relationship in which trustees hold property for beneficiaries

Explanation

A trust is an equitable relationship in which property is vested in trustees, who hold it for beneficiaries. The trustees hold legal title, while the beneficiaries hold the beneficial interest; a personal promise alone does not create this structure.

Study with flashcards

Lock in the answers with 66 flashcards on Equity and Trusts.

Who traditionally received petitions against rigid common-law remedies in the Middle Ages?

The Lord Chancellor.

What title is traditionally given to the Lord Chancellor?

Keeper of the King’s conscience.

By which centuries had the Court of Chancery developed a distinct jurisdiction?

By the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.

See the flashcards →

Read the study guide

Go over the full study guide for Equity and Trusts.

Read the study guide →

Related classes

Intellectual Property and Trademarks

Romanian Civil Law Foundations

Droit Civil

Introduction au droit

Business Law and Enterprise Types

Droit Civil

Constitutional Law and the State

Droit Public

British Institutions and Constitutional Law

Droit Public

Make your own practice quizzes

Upload your class notes and Revizly writes a practice quiz with explained answers in about a minute.

Quiz maker